Being against abortion out of rationalistic consistency (though no moral obligation is provable, one can be consistent in them and be committed to living for the only values system that is probabilistic, that being Christianity's widely misunderstood moral tenets) and egalitarian humanitarianism does not contradict logical axioms. It is possible to be pro-life without making any assumptions, without elevating the unborn over those outside the womb, and without discriminating against anyone because of their gender. Certain liberals pretend this is not the case, that someone can only be pro-life in an effort to ignore those who have already been born, to control women, or to preserve systematic poverty that does make it easier to exploit workers (a tired, desperate worker is less likely to resist workplace tyranny).
None of these things are true. Perhaps some people with political or economic power do oppose abortion because they want a steady supply of poverty slaves, too desperate or manipulated to easily escape exploitative labor. Declining birthrates would mean a smaller pool of people to potentially exploit. This is possible, but even if it was the only reason why any living person was against abortion, it would not be the only logically possible motivation and would still be irrelevant to whether abortion really is morally permissible or abominable. There is also the fact that it does not follow from one person hating abortion for this reason that anyone else does as well.
Another motivation that might be present for some people, but that has nothing to do with the real logical, scientific, or moral nature of abortion, is misogyny. It is possible for someone to condemn abortion because it is something done to a woman's body to terminate a pregnancy, the thought of a woman exercising autonomy frightening or angering them. It neither follows from this being possible that a pro-life person is driven by sexism against women nor follows from some people doing this that others are. No one has a right to do anything immoral, and the same things are obligatory, evil, or amoral for both men and women. The issue is whether fetuses are humans and whether killing unborn humans for any reason other than to save the mother's life is immoral. The moral rights of the unborn as humans and the moral freedom of people outside the womb would be the same regardless of age, size, or gender.
This is the true egalitarianism of pro-life ideology itself when it is not connected to any fallacies. Even if pro-choice philosophy was true, it would still not be the case that everyone who opposes it must be motivated by classism or sexism against women or that they will trample on people the moment they are born. These are liberal myths that are just as false as the conservative idea that no moral issue could be more important than abortion. Is a pro-life proponent rational just because they are pro-life? Not at all, as anyone can believe that which is true and demonstrable for irrationalistic reasons like emotional comfort, societal encouragement, tradition, or sheer fucking assumptions made without any external pressures from other people or experiences. They are also not irrational simply for being pro-life.
People are not necessarily pro-life because they want to trap the poor in lifelong labor or shackle women to motherhood. In fact, this is likely to not even be hinted to be the real motivation by even the most emotionalistic conservative fools. Rational or not, there are many reasons someone could be pro-life, and there are no rational reasons at all why one would be pro-choice since inseparable tenets of this stance include at least one of the following: that moral obligations are knowable through conscience, that the unborn are not human, that some humans have rights and not others due to preference or legal norms, that convenience justifies killing a person, or that men are irrelevant to the nature of abortion and whatever a woman wants deserves to be supported because she is a woman. As false or assumption-based as many conservative beliefs about abortion are, the liberal pro-choice stance is inherently irrational and in many of its forms sexist itself, just against primarily men, as if all people are not capable of knowing and striving for the truth no matter their gender even if almost no one does.
No comments:
Post a Comment