The approach that many employers have to their workers is adversarial and exploitative from the start: the former are hoping to extract the maximum amount of profitability from the latter while giving them as little as they can get away with (concessions, compensation, benefits) without violating arbitrary human laws rooted in nothing but conscience or social norms, or without scaring away all prospective workers altogether. Such employers might be slow to rectify dangerous working conditions or actively rely on them in order to save money, and therefore maximize the allegedly almighty bottom line, lie to workers about starting pay or raises, or promote micromanaging at almost every turn.
Moreover, in America, at least, where voluntary resignation (or resignation where the employee is pressured to initiate) can make collecting unemployment less feasible or useful than if a worker is fired, unnecessarily harsh or outright predatory treatment is used to "encourage" unwanted employees to leave so that the employer does not have to pay unemployment. One might even see an employer treat their human capital severely in an irrationalistic manner and then complain when the workers depart, or drive them away and then fret over replacing them or when company consistency suffers during the transition.
Human capital, the skills of workers and by extension the employees themselves, is what drives business. Pragmatically, it is stupid to treat one's human capital harshly, since this is objectively counterproductive to keeping many parts of business function smooth. The human workers and thus human capital are literally an integral part of any company that is not a sole proprietorship unless the "employees" are all robots. Workers do have one of the kinds of power in business [1], for without them, there would be an inherent and extreme restriction on the scope of a company. It could never reach heights larger than what a single person could accomplish on their own, and yet it is not difficult to find one employer after another who allows greed or ego to dictate their relationship with workers.
What happens when a business runs out of willing workers? What happens when vital employees leave or have the motivation to work exhausted out of them by stupidity from above? Company leadership might firmly insist that it cares about its workers and will take genuine concerns into consideration; pathetic lip service is more likely all that is being articulated to little effect. Completely separate from the issue of moral obligations towards one's workers, which would entail that one should treat them or not treat them in particular ways regardless of convenience or emotional appeal (and if you identify as Christian and would oppose the likes of Leviticus 19:13 and Deuteronomy 24:14-15, you are in serious error), trampling on human capital literally hinders a business.
Logic, people. It is very fucking helpful.
No comments:
Post a Comment