So many seem to think that if there is an afterlife, it could only be about the moral reward or punishment for how people have lived before biological death. Also, what they envision as the contents of the afterlife are very narrow spectrums of what what is logically possible, aka what does not contradict logical axioms, the only things that are inherently true. Dying, entering nonexistence or unconsciousness until a time of resurrection (like the Biblical Sheol of Ecclesiastes 9), and then experiencing conscious existence again would entail an afterlife, but this is not the typical example of the concept in my country, and the eschatological context of what follows is heavily moralistic. Reincarnation, whether guided by God or unguided, is another such thing, though this is contrary to Biblical doctrines, unlike soul sleep/annihilation before resurrection. Then there are the many blissful or harsh afterlives that do not contradict logical axioms and yet have nothing to do with morality.
The truth is that if there is an afterlife, it might have nothing to do with morality; likewise, if morality exists, it would be possible for it to have nothing to do with the hypothetical existence a person could have after the death of their body. Morality could exist and human souls still die with the body, their consciousness fading into permanent nonexistence at the moment of death, something that is not contradicted by the fact that there is an uncaused cause despise the idiotic faith of many religious people or the denial of atheists. Morality could exist and whatever afterlife might await me might also just not be determined by my rationality or righteousness in life. This is a far more serious reason to be terrified than mental nonexistence, which is something that involves no consciousness and thus no capacity for pain: we have no way of knowing if there is an afterlife, how much it would vary from person to person, or what beings would actually make it so.
Some of the most objectively dreadful but still logically possible afterlives in fiction rely on this fact, that it is not every sort of existence after death that would be about how morally upright someone is. It is only in the context of very specific things being true that this would be the case. God's existence does not mean God has a moral nature, and even if he does, some other being could still redirect souls to itself or some hellish realm, and I do not mean the Gehenna of the Bible where sinners die (Matthew 10:28, Ezekiel 18:4, 2 Peter 2:6, Revelation 20:15). I mean a hellish dimension that could involve eternal suffering or the worst kinds of evil acts. God exists [1], but, moreover, the uncaused cause might be unaware of or apathetic towards what happens to people after death, and everyone or most people experience an afterlife of amoral bliss whether they become disembodied consciousnesses or are given new bodies to inhabit.
This is unlikely, since it is very evidentially probable that Christianity is true and the Bible does not teach these unconventional afterlives, but that does not mean they contradict axioms and thus are false by inherent necessity. They do not; there is nothing about them that is contrary to necessary truths. As such, they either are true or could have been true. Again, there is far more to be frightened of with this than the eternal nonexistence some expect, as if they know what does or does not await after death. Many afterlives are possible. Some people merely get so caught up in the most renowned religious or most culturally prominent entertainment-related afterlives to ever discover these things. If everyone has an afterlife of some kind, how involved God is, if there is an afterlife for animals, if it is very different for different people, and if it is connected to one's deeds in life are all unknowable with my limitations. I know if many logical possibilities. I do not know what will be the case.
No comments:
Post a Comment