Languages do not exist either by logical necessity or in the natural world unless beings create them, and there is no pressing reason to invent a language except to communicate precisely with other non-telepathic beings. Plenty of things that a host of people think or at least say are put forth in religious texts like the Bible or the Quran ultimately are stated nowhere in the text or might even contradict it. Regular mealtimes and currencies are likewise contrived by people or hypothetically by some other analogous creatures, having no existence otherwise.
What about race? Is the color of someone's skin, the correlating physical features like hair type, or lineage something that would not exist apart from a human creating it or acting like it does (though acting like something is true never makes logical falsities correct)? Race is not a human construct at the personal or societal level. Attitudes and expressions of racism are in each of their varying forms. That there are different skin colors people naturally have, separate from the impact of sunlight on the skin, or that some people have ancestors of a particular skin color does not come about from individual or collective belief or cultural tradition.
The real construct in this regard is racism with all of its stereotypes and double standards. False on every level, for the color of someone's skin or any other physical characteristic necessitates nothing about their rationality, capacity for rationality, moral character, personality, or competencies, racism does not exist without some delusional being to assume its veracity or to live as if it is true. Skin colors in all their diversity are attributes of people's physical bodies, which as aforementioned do not dictate anything else about them as an individual. And if one black, Asian, or white person, and so on, has a certain level of intelligence or some particular moral standing or personality, there are no ramifications for the individualistic nature of other people of their race.
Perhaps some people idiotically do think that races among Earth's humans must be more like the alternate meaning of the word race in fantasy and science fiction and entail people of various races being from some kind of different species or subspecies. This lunacy is at odds with both logic and reported science; having a different skin color, nose shape, or other such physical characteristic does not logically mean that someone is not human or is mentally different, and empirically, biological differences—which are not the same as psychological differences—would appear to have little to nothing to do with anything more than the likes of external appearance or genetic susceptibility/resistance to certain diseases. That is, race is the color of someone's skin, and there might be a handful of other purely physical qualities that correlate with this.
Now, science is always irrelevant to logic's inherent truth, and even aside from scientific evidence or reality, race is not a social construct. The kind of person who would say race is invented by society as opposed to things like racial segregation or arbitrary customs assigned to a particular race probably thinks the truth of the matter is rooted in science instead of logic. But logical necessity is at the heart of all truths one way or another. Just as gender is not a human construct, though gender "roles" and cultural stereotypes are constructs by logical necessity, contrary to both the truths of reason and to Biblical philosophy, the same is true about race and racism. This is not a matter of science, which pertains to physical existents/phenomena.
Because it does not logically follow that psychological differences accompany physical differences and it is impossible for one to intrinsically entail the other, it could only be true that the former are made up and do not depend upon race. Race is not a social or subjective construct, but racist beliefs and practices can only be exactly such things.
No comments:
Post a Comment