Friday, April 5, 2024

God Resurrected Jesus: Another Refutation Of Trinitarianism

It is not particularly hard to come across passages that refute conventional Trinitarianism.  They will just largely be read by assumption-enslaved people who overlook the way such verses very clearly teach a metaphysical distinction between Jesus and God.  For example, see 1 Corinthians 8:6 and 1 Timothy 2:5 and 6:14-16 to find Paul presenting the two as their own beings.  He does not say Jesus is God, but that Jesus is the mediator between humanity and God.  Jesus himself says that the Father has knowledge he does not (Matthew 24:36), has his own will that Christ submits to (Luke 22:42), and is the only default good being, the latter statement being his response to the rich young ruler when Christ is called good (Mark 10:17-18).  Jesus is the Christ but not God (1 John 2:22-23 teaches this while obviously referring to the two separately).

Any of these verses is enough to refute Trinitarianism on its own.  What of the handful of verses like John 10:30, where Jesus says he and the Father are one?  John 10:30, even in isolation, would not have to mean anything more than that Jesus and Yahweh are in ideological unity, and in this very chapter, Jesus distinguishes himself from the Father more than once (such as in 10:25-29, and see John 5:19-30).  The context already clarifies that this is not an affirmation of Trinitarianism.  Only a fool would think Genesis 2 and 1 Corinthians 6 teach that a man and woman who have sex, in becoming one flesh, literally become one metaphysical entity instead of sharing a deep physical intimacy!  Though they would probably not be quite stupid enough to make this error, for the sake of tradition, many people assume that Jesus is literally equating himself with God when this is declared the straw man misinterpretation of his Jewish opponents (John 5:18, 10:31-37).

Another way the Bible presents Jesus and God as separate beings is easy to demonstrate.  Acts 2:24, 2:27, 2:32, 5:30, and 17:30-31 all make it as clear as language can that it is God who is supposed to have resurrected Christ.  Jesus was only a passive recipient of this miracle.  Paul says in Romans 10:9 that it is God who raised Jesus to life, not Jesus who raised himself.  In Revelation 1:18, Jesus says he was dead and now is alive forever, not that he raised himself from the dead.  Over and over, the New Testament emphasizes that it is God, also called Yahweh or the Father, who raised Jesus from the dead while always distinguishing between them.  First of all, it is plainly said to be one being, God, resurrecting another, Jesus.  Second of all, Trinitarianism has other problems regarding the death of Christ.

If he was truly "fully human" as evangelicals put forth, he would not only be incapable of being killed by another entity (1 Timothy 6:15-16), but he also would have entered Sheol's state of unconsciousness before his own resurrection (Ecclesiastes 9:5-10, Job 3:11-19, Daniel 12:2, Psalm 6:5, Isaiah 38:18-19, Mark 5:35-40, and so on).  His consciousness would have lacked all experience along with those of other people between their death and resurrection.  This would require that he would not have been able to resurrect himself anyway, since, as Ecclesiastes puts it, he would be totally devoid of perception and action, and as Job and Daniel put it, he would sleep.  Jesus would have been as helpless as all who are dead according to the true Biblical doctrines of death, resurrection, and the afterlife.

In addition to these teachings and those from other passages I have previously addressed, including John 14:28, which says the Father is greater than Jesus (an impossibility if they are the same!), the Biblical statements about how God resurrected Christ also affirm that the latter is not the same as Yahweh.  Jesus is higher than humans, having existed before the universe (John 1:1-3) and yet likely being created by God (John 3:16, Colossians 1:17).  If you take the Bible literally when the text points to this, you will realize numerous controversial things.  The falsity of Trinitarianism, which is already logically necessary since any form of Trinitarianism that is not really Unitarianism with multiple personas or polytheism contradicts the inherent truth of logical axioms, is among them.

The Bible is theonomist (Deuteronomy 4:2, 5-8, 12:32, Malachi 3:6, Matthew 5:17-19, and many more), annihilationist (Ezekiel 18:4, Matthew 10:28, Luke 15:1-5, John 3:16, 2 Peter 2:6, and many more), and gender egalitarian (Genesis 1:26-27, 5:1-2, Numbers 5:1-7, and many more), and it teaches soul sleep before the resurrection and that Jesus is not Yahweh.  The irony is that many of the insects who think otherwise claim that they are the ones interpreting the Bible literally unless the text requires a figurative meaning, yet Jesus cannot lack knowledge the Father has (Matthew 24), be God's begotten Son (John 3:16), and so on unless he is his own being.  The difference between Jesus and Yahweh is just one thing such people are likely to come to by social conditioning and eisegesis, but for whatever reason, it is something many people cling to even when they reject other popular Biblical heresies like anti-nomianism and eternal conscious torment.

No comments:

Post a Comment