Tuesday, December 1, 2020

The Individualistic Freedom Of Christian Life

It is one thing to realize that one is Biblically permitted to engage in a particular act without fearing one has lept into sin, but it is even more liberating to systematically embrace the fact that there is no sin where God has not prohibited people from acting on their desires.  The true extent of a Christian's personal freedom to explore their individual lifestyle preferences far exceeds what many would expect after listening to most prominent self-identified Christians speak on the matter.  Only two requirements actually impose themselves on how individuals should live.

There are no contraints whatsoever on how someone should conduct themselves as long as they do not try to fight or escape reason or commit any kind of sin.  While some may view even these qualifications as unwanted confinements, as if logic could ever be escaped or overturned in the first place, there is actually an enormous amount of freedom that Christians (and all other people) have to live their lives as they please.  The commands of Mosaic Law and Jesus leave a vast amount of behavioral territory in amoral waters, meaning that there is simply no reason to fear a desire to do that which the Bible does not condemn.

If someone wants to spend a great deal of free time sexually pleasuring himself or herself for its own sake or for the sake of introspection, they are Biblically free to do so.  Likewise, if someone wishes to spend much of their time consuming entertainment media for the sake of emotional or intellectual pleasure, they are free to do so.  The same is true of any other pastime or activity that the Bible does not oppose.  Where God's revealed laws do not denounce an act or desire, there is no sin at all (Deuteronomy 4:2, 1 John 3:4).  Legalistic minds ignore this in favor of irrational, extra-Biblical demands that ironically themselves contradict the command of Deuteronomy 4:2.

Christian life is therefore not the anti-pleasure crusade that so many mistake it for, whether out of sheer stupidity or sincere but avoidable confusion.  What the Bible actually defines as sin, both in terms of its epistemological and metaphysical nature and in terms of the specific deeds that defy God's moral nature, is often at odds with cultural and traditional understandings of Christian morality.  No matter how many people are shocked or offended, every individual person can behave exactly as they wish as long as they do not sin.  As important as the matter is, it is as simple as that!

These truths can have a deeply relieving, empowering, and rejuvenating impact on the relatively small number of Christians who discover them.  For those who have been conditioned by the prominent legalistic teachings in the church, they are a potential key to a life full of more sincere service to God and personal satisfaction.  For those who may have never dealt with many forms of legalism but still realized these truths on their own, they are an affirmation of the true nature of Biblical ethics.  The Biblical God does not oppose people for fulfilling their subjective whims where those whims do not conflict with reason and morality, no matter how unique or shocking they are.

4 comments:

  1. Cooper, I have the most 100% serious and important question as we enter in the holiday season that requires a thorough rationalist response...

    Does Die Hard really count as a Christmas movie???

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sadly, I have not seen any of the Die Hard movies, so I have no idea how much Christmas factors into the story! However, a Christmas movie would have to be about Christmas in particular and not just happen to be set around Christmas to fit into the caregory of "Christmas movie," so something like Iron Man 3 doesn't qualify. If Die Hard is about Christmas itself, which doesn't seem to be the case from what I've heard, it would be a Christmas movie, but if Christmas is just a happenstance time in which a story having nothing to do with the holiday is set, then Die Hard isn't in that category!

      Delete
    2. Hahaha that's exactly the argument I make! They only refer to the first Die Hard, not the other ones. As someone who has seen it, yeah, the plot only takes place on Christmas Eve and that's really it. But that's the supposed reason as to why people call it their favorite Christmas film. The real focus of the movie is a terrorism plot and one man fighting back against it, so you almost kind of forget about it being Christmas. It's only a small part of the movie and has no relevance or advancement of the story.

      It seems people mean it as a joke when they say it's their favorite Christmas movie, but some of my friends and family get very defensive though when I say that it isn't. It's definitely one of the silliest, amusing debates on the internet haha

      Delete
    3. I've never heard anyone say that the sequels are Christmas movies, so that makes sense! I also don't ever hear anyone saying that movies that partly occur on New Year's Eve are "New Year's movies, so there's not a lot of open consistency from these people anyway. Maybe the ones who get defensive when their fallacious understanding of Christmas movies just have a strong emotional attachment to Christmas and like movies more when they have that setting. Now, I have seen a lot of people claim that Christmas is a pagan holiday, but that's a very different issue involving Christmas!

      Delete