Friday, June 15, 2018

The Justice Of Individualism

Justice is treating a person as he or she deserves.  Treating different people differently, thus, is just if those people act differently.  That justice entails distinguishing between one individual and another is hardly difficult to establish rationally or Biblically, yet the ramifications to this are enormous.  Since justice might require that one person be treated a certain way and a different person in a another way, it follows that it is unjust to assume something about a person based upon the actions of another person.

Individualism has an ironic relationship with the American public.  On one hand, Americans might be quick to cling to the idea of personal freedom, which is an inescapably individualistic concept.  On the other hand, some of them are also often quick to preemptively judge other people in various ways on the basis of stereotypes, which is intrinsically contradictory to individualism.  The ironies and contradictions of American society are plentiful, so it is not as if these conflicting appeals to individualism and stereotypes form the only inconsistency in American society.  For instance, Americans might also love to decry ignorance, yet they are also often eager to defend stupidity by insisting that "everyone has a right to their own opinion"--a thing that is logically impossible!

I am not committing the very thing I am attacking here, though, as I am not pretending like being born into America necessitates that one will eventually gravitate towards hypocrisies and errors.  No one has to succumb to these ironies and contradictions just by living in the United States.  And it is not as if Americans, unique in time and geography, are the only ones that tend to be stupid.  These errors are all embraced purely from one of two sources, if not both: individual stupidity or societal conditioning.  I do not judge a person from a position of ignorance or assume that the person must be a certain way simply because he or she is an American (or a representative of some other group).

Many people might be tempted to treat stereotypes as quick routes to knowledge about other people--but this is ludicrous, for reason and justice demand that a person must be appraised and judged as his or her own autonomous individual, not judged by association with others, with preconceived notions guiding a conclusion.  People are autonomous, complex, and wildly unique; they will not all merely turn out to be personality clones.  And yet some persist in the fallacious pursuit of assuming things about a person based upon factors like their age, appearance, gender, ethnicity, and multiple other variables too.

Despite all the cultural forces that could motivate the preservation of stereotypes, people remain their own individual selves.  One person does not have to be like another in terms of personality.  Assumptions, always being unwarranted by their very nature, can never serve as justification for treating a person a certain way.  Therefore, it can only be inherently unjust to assume something about a person's personality or moral character, since the only way for a non-telepath to come to know someone as an individual is by getting to know that person (there is no such thing as a rational assumption to begin with).  Someone's age, gender, ethnicity, social status, and country of birth or residence cannot tell you if he or she has a certain set of personality characteristics or if he or she is a good person.  There have been legions of stereotypes based on each of these categories, and in all cases they are fallacious.

Individualism is simply true, whether someone likes it or not.  It is also just whether or not someone wants to acknowledge it.  For some, the temptation to judge a person's character, interests, tendencies, or skills from afar--by means of a non sequitur conclusion based on irrelevant information--can be quite strong.  Perhaps it feels safe.  It might be a familiar way of life.  The only way one can truly see someone's personal characteristics, worldview, and character, however, is to get to know that person as the individual that he or she is.

5 comments:

  1. There are reasons for stereotypes, though it is true that there are exceptions that don't quite fit the mold.

    Everyone unconsciously carries deep within their psyches a self-image, and this self-image is associated with a set of criteria and values. In effect everyone wants, or even craves, to have this self-image validated...what the heart loves most is its own reflection.

    Understand this and most human behaviors will easily and effortlessly unfold before your eyes. For instance, a woman who believes she's ugly will not accept or will even take offense to a complement, whereas if you recognize her ugliness, her heart will sing. Same as with an alcoholic...wanna see him get real happy, tell him what a no good piece of shit he is. Why? Because it matches their map. And notice how people will constantly telegraph how they wish to be judged.

    And of course Christians, being born of divinity can be especially peculiar and exempt from the ordinary rules of engagement.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What are you talking about? If a subconscious part of the human mind exists (and I don’t mean the existence of memories you aren’t consciously thinking about at a given moment), how would you know? If it’s unconscious you wouldn’t even be able to identify it in other people or yourself.

      You are assuming that the examples you give hold in all cases. People might not even know how they want to be judged, so they aren’t necessarily telegraphing it. How do you know the interior of someone else’s consciousness? Are you a telepath?

      Delete
  2. I've had extensive training in clinical hypnotherapy. We all have three distinct brains or divisions of the psyche that function independently and interdependently.

    At the base level your body has its own mind and intelligence and means of communication...and this is becomes very evident the more you become aware of it primarily through body language - both overt and in micro expressions. The is termed the unconscious mind and governs most of your behavior most of the time.
    Moreover, it can be easily and effortlessly programmed and re-programmed once you understand its functioning and can bypass its (and your own) firewalls.
    How do I know this is true? Because it works.

    The purpose in a man’s heart is like deep water, but a man of understanding will draw it out. - proverbs 20:5

    Above all else, guard your heart, for everything you do flows from it. Proverbs 4:23

    The good person out of the good treasure of his heart produces good, and the evil person out of his evil treasure produces evil, for out of the abundance of the heart his mouth speaks. Luke 6:45

    etc, etc, etc...


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What an obvious appeal to authority! I love how in a comment on another post you equated the mind with the body, and now you distinguish between them. And you have only appealed to unverifiable premises here.

      Also, if you become aware of the subconscious/unconscious, it is no longer the subconscious, since one then has a conscious awareness of it. Prove to me that I have a part of my mind that I cannot access with my mind. There is no logical syllogism, act of introspection, or scientific experiment that can demonstrate what you are talking about.

      Those verses have absolutely nothing to do with whether or not what you are saying is true. I’m not surprised to see red herrings from you, though.

      Delete
  3. Some things can't be so easily proven, especially in text. Instead they must be demonstrated and experienced as the best evidence of truth is not so much which seems correct, according to what you know, but that which works in practice that generates real and profound results. What does it really mean to cast out demons? This might offer some clarity:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IvO8ZsQYUK0

    ReplyDelete